The Gretsch Pages

<p><p>Like the Atkins Axe, the Super Axe was released in 1977 and was supposed to offer a completely modern instrument for the rock guitarist. </p> <p>The Super Axe also shared its basic body shape with the Atkins Axe, but it benefitted from much more involvement from Chet Atkins, and a bevy of built-in effects. </p> <p>A football-shaped pickguard held controls for an onboard compressor, phaser and sustain electronics, all powered by a nine-volt battery. Unfortunately, the electronics have failed with age on many of the Supers Axes, and schematics are extremely difficult to find. </p> <p>The solid mahogany body is wide but thin, and it tapers toward the edges, making it both lighter and more comfortable to play than it might appear. </p> <p>Beyond that, the general construction and hardware of the Super Axe show how Gretsch was aiming for a different sound and market, particularly the DiMarzio humbuckers and BadAss wraparound stop bridge. The more traditional buyer could order an optional Adjustamatic bridge/B-5 &quot;Horseshoe&quot; Bigsby combination. </p> <p>For those willing to take the plunge on this unusual and rewarding Gretsch, three variations were offered: the dark red 7680 Super Axe, dark gray 7681 Super Axe and sunburst 7682 Super Axe. </p> <p>Note that the Super Axe should not be confused with the much more ornate and altogether different Super Chet. </p>

See Also:

• 7685 Atkins Axe
• 7682 Super Axe
• 7680 Super Axe

Comments

1. doug64 wrote:

   I bought mine used in December of 2006. The one drawwback as mentioned elsewhere is the failure of the electronics. Most minrange amps will take care of that lack however.

   — Jul 22, 2007 2:31 p.m.

2. doug64 wrote:

   I bought mine used in December of 2006. The one drawback as mentioned elsewhere is the failure of the electronics. Most midrange amps will take care of that lack however.

   — Jul 22, 2007 2:32 p.m.

3. JohnBoot wrote:

   I had a lot of work done on this. The electronics are great. The BadAss has been removed, and replaced with a modern bridge --the original saddles were filed too short. The nut was cut funny with a large gap between the first and second string. The fingerboard was concave. Totally restored, and what a wonderful instrument. But who owned it before I purchased it used I wish I knew. Someone used this instrument, and must have loved it, but the work on it was less than professional. Now that has all been corrected. I would like to find a new case, but not sure what of get. Would like a Guardian. Any info. Model 7681 Serail 5-8326. Jake

   — Dec 20, 2007 11:04 p.m.